| 
Public Assistance and Social Welfare
Contents
The Poorhouse >
Outdoor Relief > Children's
Law of 1875 > Child Saving >
Home Relief > The New Deal > Aliens
and the WPA > The War on Poverty
> Welfare Policy Today
The New Deal
By the time Franklin D. Roosevelt took office
in 1933, voluntary agencies, and state and city governments had
exhausted all of their human and financial resources. Having done
what they could to combat the massive unemployment and economic
upheaval levied by the Great Depression, they turned to the federal
government for help. FDR never intended to alter the structure
of American capitalism. Rather, he sought to rescue it, responding
to the crisis with a flurry of legislation during his famous first
hundred days.1
Between 1933-1935, federal legislation addressed the immediate
issues of stabilizing the economy and getting unemployed Americans
back to work. The massive amount of legislation proposed by President
Roosevelt and enacted by Congress during the first hundred days
of the new administration was unprecedented in U.S History. The
Agricultural Adjustment Act (AAA) endeavored to help American
farmers by stabilizing crop prices. The Civilian Conservation
Corps (CCC) promoted environmental conservation by recruiting
young men to plant trees, clear beaches, and build wild life shelters.
The Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) sought to modernize that
region by building dams and power plants along the Tennessee River
in order to bring electric power to rural areas in seven states.
The National Industrial Recovery Act (NIRA) sought to stimulate
production and competition by encouraging American industries
to create a set of codes designed to regulate prices, output,
and general trade.2
Unable to offer a quick, permanent solution, FDR tapped his experience
as Governor of New York State to create the nation's first federal
relief system. The Federal Emergency Relief Administration (FERA),
one of the first and most expensive creations of the New Deal,
regularized the national government's role in relief by matching
relief monies spent in individual states. While it is true that
FERA was designed as a shared undertaking between the federal
government and the states, relief was shaped and underwritten
at the national level. Even though state and local authorities
administered federal funds on programs such as Home Relief, decision
making power really lay in Washington.
Shortly after, warned of horrible suffering and rioting to come
in the winter of 1934, President Roosevelt instituted a temporary
but massive program of public works. Collectively known as the
Second New Deal, the measures of 1935 included those that have
most defined the legacy of the Roosevelt years: Social Security,
the Works Progress Administration (WPA), and the National Labor
Relations Act (Wagner Act). The Works Progress Administration
replaced an earlier New Deal work relief program, the Pubic Works
Administration (PWA), and put unemployed Americans to all kinds
of work, from repairing highways to cataloguing archives and recording
the stories of ex-slaves. Within a year, it employed 3 million
people and, by the end of its seven year existence, a total of
8.5 million.3
The Wagner Act proved to have a lasting impact on the relationship
between business and labor. Guaranteeing the right to unionize
and the right to bargain collectively with management and administration,
the act for the first time institutionalized government recognition
of labor unions. Indeed, the Wagner Act made possible the Congress
of Industrial Organizations (CIO).
The Social Security Act, signed by President Roosevelt in 1935,
established a permanent system of unemployment compensation, old
age insurance, and aid for disabled and dependent children. Despite
all of the act's limitations-the exclusion of many types of workers,
the regressive pay roll tax method of funding it, the small benefits-it
is important not to lose sight of the strong impression it made
on workers who had never before been offered any security by the
government. However, the administration knew that a reserve fund
for old-age could not remain solvent throughout the late twentieth
century. Indeed, the system's architects foresaw that demand would
outstrip resources by the 1990s. Nevertheless, they helped preserve
the fiction that social security was a perpetual insurance fund
built on contributions which it returned with interest. By pointedly
distinguishing social security from relief, they froze the distinction
between social insurance and relief into federal policy, where
it has been stuck ever since, and built a regressive system that
reinforced economic inequalities.4
Despite his mounting political strength and the variety of options
from which he could have chosen, FDR, worried about the reactions
of both business and agriculture, withdrew from the possibilities
of the moment and built a semiwelfare state that used the power
of the federal government to reinforce the distinction between
social insurance and public assistance and preserve income inequality.
The administration as a whole was politically cautious, more geared
toward addressing emergencies than solving long-term problems
and, most importantly, ambivalent about the enlargement of federal
power. With the major public employment program, the WPA, sharply
curtailed by the late 1930s, the new semiwelfare state offered
little immediate help to the poor. In the end, the global violence
brought on by World War II, not the New Deal, lifted America out
of the Great Depression.5
Still, it would be wrong to dismiss the significance of New Deal
social legislation. The American welfare state born during the
depression turned out to be weaker than that of other western
industrial nations such as England, France, and Germany. But a
new direction nonetheless had been set. Emergency programs prevented
mass starvation and, very possibly, massive social disorder. Social
security did introduce the idea of entitlement into national policy
and establish federal responsibility for a wide range of human
problems. Even more, the new legislation vastly augmented the
size and scope of the national government, altered the nature
of federalism, and reorganized relations between the national
state and its citizens.6
See also:
Economic Depressions/Great Depression/Fiorello La Guardia
and New York's New Deal; Economic
Depressions/Great Depression/Public Housing and Slum Clearance;
Housing/Public Housing.
1Michael
Katz, In the Shadow of the Poorhouse: A Social History of Welfare
in America (New York: Basic Books, 1986).
2 Ibid.
3 Ibid.
4 Lizabeth Cohen, Making a New Deal:
Industrial Workers in Chicago (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,
1990); Katz, In the Shadow of the Poorhouse.
5 Cohen, Making a New Deal; Katz,
In the Shadow of the Poorhouse.
6 lbid.
|
|