Home Visiting the Museum For Educators Research and Explore


 




























 

Garment Industry

Contents
History > Composition of the Garment Industry > Dressmaking > Dressmaking in the 1870s > Women's Fashions in the 1890s > Department Stores and Changing Fashion > Garment Industry in NYC Today > Garment Labeling > Sweatshops > Triangle Shirtwaist Factory > Sewing Machine

Department Stores and Changing Fashion

Two factors played a significant role in the decline of independent dressmakers in the twentieth century. First came the grand department stores of the late nineteenth century. With large reserves of capital, department stores could combine a variety of all the components of dressmaking under one roof, and even sometimes had individual dressmaking suites where customers could deal in a setting similar to the shops of independent proprietors.

From the 1870's to 1890's clothing could be purchased in New York City (ready-to-wear or made-to-measure) including department and retail stores, but also at dressmaker-import houses, and through the more traditional tailor. Department stores in New York proliferated throughout the end of the nineteenth century, among the better-known and biggest are: A.T. Stewart, Lord & Taylor, B. Altman, Stern, Bonwit Teller, R.H. Macy & Co., Brooks Brothers, and Siegel-Cooper. A testament to the rise of consumerism, when Siegel-Cooper opened in 1896 more then 100,000 people came to the opening celebration on Sixth Avenue and 19th Street. Additionally, during the late nineteenth century, dressmaker-import houses began to be differentiated by name, in a rise of brand consciousness. Among the more renowned were: L.P. Hollander, Mrs. C. Donovan, White-Howard & Co., Macheret, T.M. and J.M. Fox (so exclusive that it shunned all publicity), Mme. A. E. Sauer, M. A. Connelly, Albert Guerin, Marian Dick, Mme. Burlmeyer, Mme. Ferrero, Mme. Regnier, Mrs. Davidson (known for the simplicity of her clothes), Mme. Rallings (one of the retail world's arbiters of taste). These dressmakers were known for their different styles and seem to have designed clothes to be made-to-measure as well as some ready-to-wear pieces. It is a possibility that with the proliferation of dressmaker-import houses (as opposed to smaller dressmaker shops), these houses may have outsourced the construction of their clothing to smaller contractors, including tenement sweatshops.

By the 1870's ready-to-wear and made-to-individual measure clothing was available through catalogs, which were distributed by New York's luxury stores. Clients could send in their measurements and order anything from "walking suits to dinner and bridal dresses, mourning clothes, underwear, hats, shoes, shawls and wraps." (Ready-to-wear required bust and waist measurements, while made-to-individual measure clothing required a dozen or so measurements.) In the Montgomery Ward and Sears Roebuck catalogs of the 1890's, women's clothing is available and includes: cloaks, shirtwaists, skirts, tailor-mades, nightgowns, wrappers and tea-gowns, shoes, hats, shawls, and underwear.


Technological Improvements

Technological advancements in the garment industry (sewing machines, patterns, cutting machines) actually had the result of making clothing manufacture more time consuming. "Ironically, the sewing machine and related inventions had the direct result of rendering fashion more complicated, as designs incorporated new methods and techniques in order to sate the desire for a labor-intensive look so gratifying to the status seeker." The rise of the middle class in the late 1800's and the prosperity that followed the war led to a general tendency towards ostentation in dress, and clothes were often excessively constricting and ornamental, covered in time-intensive garnishments and passementerie. These time-consuming practices may have been performed in sweatshop apartments, due to the nature of the work and the fact that the taste for high-fashion details (like feathers, beads) changes quickly and therefore does not lend itself to mass production.

Changes in Style

The second blow to independent dressmakers and the craft-styled production they participated in came from the fashion industry itself. With the 1920s came looser fitting, more simply constructed clothing. Custom craftwork was no longer necessary to produce such clothes and the women's ready-to-wear clothing industry rapidly expanded to meet the demand. By the 1930s, factories produced clothing for all but the wealthiest consumers who continued to patronize custom dress shops.
For further reading, see: Wendy E. Gamber, "The Female Economy: The Millinery and Dressmaking Trades, 1860-1930" (Ph.D. diss., Brandeis University, 1991); Irving Howe, World of Our Fathers (New York, 1976.); Susan Strasser, Never Done: A History of American Housework (New York, 1982); Roger D. Waldinger, Through the Eye of the Needle: Immigrants and Enterprise in New York's Garment Trades (New York: New York University Press, 1986). Caroline Rennolds Milbank, New York Fashion: The Evolution of American Style, New York: Harry Abrams, 1996)

See also: Gumpertz Family; Sweatshop.


previous page << >> next page

© 2005 Lower East Side Tenement Museum

108 Orchard Street | 212-431-0233 | lestm@tenement.org