Home Visiting the Museum For Educators Research and Explore


 




























 

Landsmanschaftn

Contents
Landsmanschaftn > Congregational Sons of Telsh - Rogarshevskys' Benevolent Association

Landsmanschaftn
Landsmanshaftn, associations of immigrants from the same hometown, became the most popular form of organization among Eastern European Jewish immigrants to the U.S. in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Organized variously as independent mutual aid societies, religious congregations, and fraternal lodges, landsmanshaftn provided their members with valuable material benefits and served as arenas for formal and informal social interaction. Estimates of the number of landmanshaftn in New York range from 1,000 to 10,000. Surveys in the 1910s and 1930s calculated the number between 2,000 and 3,000.

The members of a landsmanshaft were drawn nearly exclusively from landsman, or the former residents of the same shtetl (village), or group of shtetlach (villages). Their chief aim consisted of maintaining the traditional and comfortable social relations of the Old World. The organization was a "home away from home" and it maintained the bonds between new immigrants and those they had left behind in the shtetl or village. These societies helped new immigrants retain ties with the past but, also, to learn the ways of the New World.

Landsleit, the plural of landsman, typically belonged to the same synagogue, engaged in similar vocations, became partners in business, lived in the same neighborhood, and intermarried within the group. A landsmanshaft had its own patriarchal leaders, its lodges and mutual aid associations, and its celebrations and festivities. These community ties were only partially apparent to the outside world.

New arrivals on the Lower East Side would almost immediately visit the landsmanshaft to help order the chaos of immigrant life. Rooted in a centuries-old tradition of community, the fraternal organization drew on that tradition provided a startling range of services: from medical care to unemployment insurance, from shiva benefits to wedding gifts.

The majority of fraternal organizations had around 150 members or less. They were loose-knit associations whose formal structures (constitutions, bylaws, officers and so forth) belied a friendly informality. The organization provided death benefits, and it hired a doctor, often an immigrant just out of medical school, who for a small retainer, would treat members at reduced rates. The cost of an illness included loss of wages as well as doctor bills. Nearly all societies offered a "sick benefit" to make up for this potentially devastating deprivation of income. The standard sick benefit consisted of five dollars weekly, about half the average wage of a poor garment worker, for six to thirteen weeks a year.

Four general categories may be distinguished among the landsmanshaftn. Although the lines drawn between them were not fixed there was considerable variation within each camp. Before 1900 religious congregations and fraternal lodges predominated. Secular mutual aid societies became more popular after about 1900, as did ideologically committed societies made up of immigrants who had been revolutionaries in Russia. Still, the older more religious societies continued to attract members, while absorbing a sizeable amount of secular American customs.

Names of organizations often denoted both the age and the social aspirations of the organizations' founders. Religious landsmanshaftn usually included a Hebrew phrase of the sort often used in the synagogue titles, followed by the word ancshe, mearning "people of," followed by the name of the members' hometown. After 1900 English names, often including the words "young men's" or "progressive" (or both), signaled members' desire to be part of the modern world and of American society. For the most part, to be "progressive" simply meant having a vague sort of forward-looking attitude and an up-to-date way of doing business. Sometimes the term denoted a sense of social liberalism or political radicalism. Other societies preferred to keep their names more neutral. For instance, the Satanover Benevolent Society chose a wording which leave their society's orientation open and perhaps allowed a broader range of landleit to feel comfortable about joining.

In the New World, many landsmanshaftn began as adjuncts of the small Orthodox synagogues that were springing up on the Lower East Side. Although, just as quickly as they were formed, many of these synagogues split off and formed their own fraternal organizations to carry on benevolent and society activities. The vast majority of the more than 400 synagogues on the Lower East Side in 1917 functioned not so much as houses of worship but more as associations for providing burial plots and charity.

The most important function of the landsmanshaft was the maintenance of funeral practices. The first thing that the organization would do after being formed was to purchase cemetery plots. Having a proper Jewish burial was paramount for Jewish immigrants. According to the historian Irving Howe, "the necessities of life might force a Jew to spend his days among strangers, but even if no longer Orthodox, he wanted to spend eternity among Jews."

Typically, landsmanshaftn were an amalgam of many voluntary associations, known as chevras. The landsmanshaft's chevra kaddisha, or burial society, (literally "holy society") actually took care of providing a physician, the preparation for the body to be buried, a cemetery plot, and a minyan or daily worship during Shiva. The family presumably was too prostrated with grief to occupy themselves with everyday affairs of living.

Burial within the community cemetery was one of the strongest tools of the fraternal organization's control and the threat of denial of burial rights was one of the strongest communal sanctions. The two functions of landsmanshaftn were the provision of cemetery grounds and a chevra kaddisha for its members. Today Jewish and non-Jewish funeral directors provide the services once monopolized by the burial society.

In 1917 and 1918, according to the Kehillah Directory, 2/3 of the more than one thousand fraternal orders that reported data to the Directory had been formed since 1900. The typical mutual aid society had an average of 143 members, dues of $6 per year, and provided sick benefits and a cemetery plot. They usually elected their officers every two years. Typically the organization met twice a month.

The landsmanshaft principle is in no way peculiar to Jewish immigrants. In fact, it is one of the most common forms of immigrant organization throughout the world. When large numbers of Jewish immigrants arrived in the U.S., they encountered a country in which voluntary associations played a critical role. Associations were particularly popular among African Americans and German Americans.

More strongly than any other organizational form, the fraternal order influenced American culture at the time when the influx of Eastern European Jews began. Modeled after the Masons and the Odd Fellows, hundreds of secret societies proliferated during the "golden age" of fraternity between the Civil War and the turn of the century. According to historian Daniel Soyer, ironically, immigrants regularly patterned their organizations after those most prevalent in American society. In striking ways, Jewish landsmanshaftn reflected the influence of the surrounding culture more clearly than they mirrored Jewish communal traditions in Eastern Europe.

previous page << >> next page

© 2005 Lower East Side Tenement Museum

 

 

 

 

 



108 Orchard Street | 212-431-0233 | lestm@tenement.org